CO129-234 - Acting Governor Cameron Governor Des Voeus - 1887 [9-12] — Page 302

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

299

finally the decision of the case rested with me. I should have no hesitation whatever in deciding that the case was not made out "for Wodehouse" and on that occasion refused to hear the witnesses for Chan Tik Cheong who were then in attendance and whose evidence was tendered.

Mr Stolmes, who was at that time solicitor for Chan Tik Cheong, will doubtless remember. As His Excellency will doubtless remember, the prisoner who was committed to gaol at the same time as Chan Tik Cheong by Mr Wodehouse was released by the Supreme Court, which held that the warrant of detainer was bad on the face of it and that Mr Wodehouse ought to have heard the witnesses for the defence.

We understand that at that time Mr Stolmes had an assurance from the Government that if Leong Afu was released under the writ of habeas corpus, Chan Tik Cheong would also be released. In fact, Chan Tik Cheong was technically released under the same warrant, but as a new warrant had been obtained by Li Loi before Chan Tik Cheong came out of gaol, the latter did not, as a matter of fact, get out of gaol before he was again arrested.

Judgment was given by the Full Court as to the release of Leong Afu on the 14th June, and a new warrant was obtained on the same day, and the prisoner who was rearrested on that day.

Although Li Loi applied for this warrant on the 14th...

Edit History

2026-05-25 20:26:24 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
299 finally the decision of the case rested with me. I should have no hesitation whatever in deciding that the case was not made out "for Wodehouse" and on that occasion refused to hear the witnesses for Chan Tik Cheong who were then in attendance and whose evidence was tendered. Mr Stolmes, who was at that time solicitor for Chan Tik Cheong, will doubtless remember. As His Excellency will doubtless remember, the prisoner who was committed to gaol at the same time as Chan Tik Cheong by Mr Wodehouse was released by the Supreme Court, which held that the warrant of detainer was bad on the face of it and that Mr Wodehouse ought to have heard the witnesses for the defence. We understand that at that time Mr Stolmes had an assurance from the Government that if Leong Afu was released under the writ of habeas corpus, Chan Tik Cheong would also be released. In fact, Chan Tik Cheong was technically released under the same warrant, but as a new warrant had been obtained by Li Loi before Chan Tik Cheong came out of gaol, the latter did not, as a matter of fact, get out of gaol before he was again arrested. Judgment was given by the Full Court as to the release of Leong Afu on the 14th June, and a new warrant was obtained on the same day, and the prisoner who was rearrested on that day. Although Li Loi applied for this warrant on the 14th...
Baseline (Original)
299 finally the decision of the can rested with me I should have no hesitation whatever ein deciding that the can was not made out "fur Wodehouse one that occasion refused to bear the witreens for Chan Tik Cheong who were then in attendance and whose evidence was Zeudered hur Stolmes who to the fourt by was at that time solicitor for (bean Ick throug As This excellency will Leong afu doubtless remember. the -prisoner who was committed to gaol at the same time as than Tik Cheong by her Wodehous was released aced by the Suprena Court which held that the warrant of on the of de detainer was bad face of it and that Aur Wodehonce ought to have heard the witnesses for the defence We We understand that at that time he stoles had au assurama from the Government that if Leong Afu was released wider. the writ of habeas corpus bis chent than Tik Cheong would also be reband. Sa fact than: Tek Cheong technically Avas released under the formuch warrant but as a new warrant had been obtained by Li Loi befor than Tch throug came out of - get our gaol the lader did not, of the was Av ao iga ol ol compound before he arrested. Judofpunt again arrested. as: Given by the Full fourt as of Reong to the release. atv the 14th Jane and news warrant. was obtained. Rame day on the ed by Zi for and the prisoner who was re arrested on that day. how although Li Zoi applied for this evarrant on the 14th !
2026-05-25 20:26:24 · Baseline
View content

299

finally

the decision of the can rested with me I should have no hesitation whatever ein

deciding

that the can was not made out "fur Wodehouse one that occasion refused to bear the witreens for Chan Tik

Cheong

who were then in attendance and whose evidence was Zeudered

hur Stolmes who

to the fourt by was at that time solicitor for (bean Ick throug

As This excellency will

Leong afu

doubtless remember.

the

-prisoner who

was committed

to gaol at the same time as

than Tik Cheong by her Wodehous

was released

aced by the Suprena

Court which held that the

warrant of

on the

of de

detainer was bad face of it and that

Aur Wodehonce ought to have

heard the witnesses for the defence

We

We understand that at that

time he stoles had

au assurama

from the Government that if Leong Afu

was released wider.

the writ of habeas corpus bis chent than Tik Cheong would also be reband. Sa fact than: Tek Cheong

technically

Avas

released under the

formuch

warrant but as a new warrant

had been obtained by Li Loi befor

than Tch throug

came out of

- get our

gaol the lader did not,

of the

was

Av ao

iga ol

ol compound before he arrested. Judofpunt

again arrested.

as:

Given by the Full fourt as of Reong

to the release.

atv

the 14th Jane and news warrant.

was obtained.

Rame

day

on the

ed by Zi for and the prisoner

who was re arrested on that

day.

how although Li Zoi

applied for this evarrant on the

14th

!

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.